R-Rated Jackie Chan Film Linked to Nude Images of Oklahoma's Education Chief on TV: House Speaker

Background of the Incident

A recent incident involving Oklahoma State Superintendent Ryan Walters has sparked significant debate and investigation. The situation began when two Oklahoma school board members claimed they witnessed nude images on the TV in Walters’ office during a meeting last month. This claim led to a forensic investigation, which has now revealed some surprising details.

Forensic Findings and the Role of "The Protector"

According to House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, the source of the images may be traced back to a 1985 Jackie Chan action movie titled “The Protector.” This R-rated thriller is known for its scenes of violence, drug use, and full nudity. Hilbert pointed out that the forensic investigation found that the Samsung smart TV in Walters’ office was playing this movie during the time the board members reported seeing the images.

The investigation also uncovered that the TV automatically opened to the Samsung TV Plus app upon being powered on. This app offers live TV from various channels, including one labeled 1204, which is an action movie hub. Investigators were able to confirm that the channel was airing “The Protector” at the time of the meeting.

Details of the Movie and the Board Members' Claims

KFOR watched the movie and confirmed that it contains several scenes matching the descriptions given by the board members. One scene involves fully nude women working inside a factory packaging cocaine, with some wearing only lab coats. Another scene shows a nude woman giving a man a massage, eventually moving under the table while the dialogue strongly suggests sexual activity. These scenes closely match what the board members claimed they saw.

Board members Ryan Deatherage and Becky Carson described the footage as showing fully nude women engaging in sexual activity on a chiropractic-style table. They noted the retro look of the images and the intimate private parts of the actors’ bodies.

Contradictions in Walters’ Statements

Walters’ account of the incident has changed over time. In a press release, Hilbert mentioned that Walters told him he saw what was on the TV before turning it off. He claimed to have seen a doctor and nurse in a white lab coat when he turned around. This contradicts his previous statements, where he denied any knowledge of what was on the TV screen and accused the board members of fabricating the story to destroy his character.

Ongoing Investigations and Legal Implications

Despite the findings, the Oklahoma County Sheriff’s Office and OSBI have confirmed that their criminal investigations are not over. They have not reached any formal conclusions, and additional findings may still emerge. No response has been received from Walters’ office regarding whether he regrets his accusations or if he supports policy changes to prevent R-rated content from playing on state-owned TVs.

Legislative Response and Public Reaction

Speaker Hilbert suggested that the findings might vindicate both the State Superintendent and the two board members, indicating that the incident may have happened unintentionally. However, several state lawmakers have stated that regardless of intent, if such an incident occurred on a teacher’s classroom TV, the teacher would be held accountable, and Walters should be treated no differently.

The case continues to draw attention, highlighting the importance of transparency and accountability in public offices. As the investigation progresses, further details may come to light, potentially affecting the perception of the individuals involved and the policies governing the use of technology in state offices.